Susan Sorrells, referred to as the applicant, applied to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service for section 10 a) (A) (A) (A) (A) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA; 16 U.S.C 1531 and following. The application for authorization contains a draft Safe Harbor Agreement (SHA) that includes 467 hectares owned by the applicant in Inyo County, California. The proposed duration of the authorization and the SHA is 30 years. The authorization would authorize the accidental capture of the at-risk muhlaus amargosa (Microtus californicus scirpensis) in exchange for habitat conservation measures to provide the species with a clear conservation benefit. We have prepared a draft Environmental Action Statement (EAS) for our preliminary conclusion that SHA and Authorization under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA; 43 U.S.C. 4321 ff) can be considered a categorical exclusion. We ask the public to review and comment on the application for authorization, the SHA project and the EAS project. In exchange for measures that contribute to the restoration of species classified on non-federal lands, participating property owners receive formal assurances from the Service that the service, if it meets the SHA requirements, does not require any additional or different management activity from participants without their consent.
In addition, at the end of the contract period, participants can return the registered property to the basic conditions that existed at the beginning of the SHA. Learn more about a Safe Harbor Agreement that provides suitable habitat for species listed as grey grey and northern owls in Northern California. Safe ports can create specific rules that are inadvertently applied. For example, driving below 25 miles per hour in a 60 MPH zone, if traffic or other conditions do not require, this could lead recklessly. The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) contains outstanding Safe Harbor provisions that protect Internet service providers from the consequences of their users` actions. (Similarly, the EU e-commerce directive provides for a similar provision of the `naked channel`, which does not satisfy exactly the same thing, but which, in this case, is roughly in accord with the DMCA`s safe harbour.) An example of a refuge is the completion of a Phase I environmental assessment by a buyer of real estate: due diligence and a safe harbor result when future contamination is caused by a previous owner. The Safe Harbour Privacy Principles was developed between 1998 and 2000.